Altered DNA methylation in estrogen-responsive repetitive sequences of spermatozoa of infertile men with shortened anogenital distance

Christian De Geyter

University of Basel, Switzerland,

Correspondance: Prof Dr med. em.Christian De Geyter UNI Basel Switzerland

Abstract

Background: Anogenital distance (AGD) is a sexually dimorphic, life-long anthropometric marker that reflects androgen/estrogen balance during a critical fetal “masculinization programming window.” Shorter male AGD has been associated with cryptorchidism, hypospadias, impaired semen quality and reduced testicular volume—core features of the testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) hypothesis. Circumstantial evidence suggests that prenatal exposure to endocrine disruptors is involved in causing TDS. Many prevalent endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) act through the estrogen receptor (ER) and can perturb fetal programming. How a transient prenatal exposure could leave durable molecular traces into adult spermatogenesis remains a key mechanistic question. A plausible mechanism is epigenetic reprogramming: in the postimplantation embryo human primordial germ cells (PGCs) undergo genome-wide DNA demethylation and subsequent re-methylation; during this window, transposable elements—particularly primate-specific Alu repeats—can be de-/re-methylated and many harbor ER-responsive sequence motifs.

Objectives: Building on clinical work from Basel we synthesize evidence and present a working model in which infertile men with shortened AGD harbor distinctive DNA-methylation patterns at estrogen-responsive Alu elements in sperm, especially within subpopulations marked by chromatin immaturity (CMA3 positivity) or apoptosis (YO-PRO-1 positivity). We outline study design, summarize core findings, and discuss translational implications and limitations.

Methods (conceptual framework): Men undergoing fertility evaluation were phenotyped (including AGD and testicular volume). Ejaculates with adequate counts were processed by swim-up and sorted by flow cytometry into fractions with high vs. low chromatin decondensation (chromomycin A3, CMA3) and with vs. without early apoptotic membrane permeability (YO-PRO-1). Reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) profiled CpG methylation genome-wide; bioinformatics focused on repetitive elements (Alu) containing canonical/pseudo-ERE motifs and ER-ChIP–supported sites.

Results (integrative summary): Across unsorted sperm, global CpG methylation distributions were broadly similar between infertile men (short AGD) and fertile donors. In sorted fractions, however, infertile men exhibited (i) enrichment of hypomethylated Alu-EREs within CMA3-positive and YO-PRO-1–positive sperm, and (ii) a deficit of hypermethylated Alu-EREs relative to fertile controls. These shifts were most evident in the “abnormal” subpopulations, consistent with histone retention/protamine deficiency and apoptotic signaling.

Conclusions: We propose that prenatal estrogenic/antiandrogenic perturbation (indexed in adulthood by shortened AGD) is traceable in sperm as altered methylation of ER-responsive repetitive elements. Such lesions concentrate in spermatozoa with defective chromatin maturation or incipient apoptosis, potentially contributing to reduced fertilizing competence and intergenerational epigenetic risk. We discuss how this model aligns with TDS and outline paths for validation (orthogonal epigenomics, si,ngle-cell assays, environmental exposure reconstruction).

Key words Cryptorchidism, ano-genital distance, estrogen

Résumé

Contexte. La distance anogénitale (AGD) est un marqueur anthropométrique sexuellement dimorphique reflétant l’équilibre androgènes/estrogènes durant la fenêtre critique de masculinisation fœtale. Une AGD masculine réduite est associée à la cryptorchidie, l’hypospadias, une qualité spermatique diminuée et un faible volume testiculaire, éléments centraux du syndrome de dysgénésie testiculaire (TDS). Plusieurs perturbateurs endocriniens (EDC) prévalents agissent via le récepteur des estrogènes (ER) et peuvent affecter la programmation fœtale. Un mécanisme plausible reliant une exposition prénatale transitoire à des altérations durables de la spermatogenèse est la reprogrammation épigénétique des cellules germinales primordiales, notamment au niveau des éléments transposables Alu, riches en motifs réactifs à l’ER.

Objectifs. Sur la base de travaux cliniques menés à Bâle, nous proposons un modèle où les hommes infertiles présentant une AGD courte montrent des profils distinctifs de méthylation de l’ADN au niveau d’éléments Alu sensibles aux estrogènes dans leurs spermatozoïdes, en particulier dans les sous-populations immatures (CMA3 positives) ou apoptotiques précoces (YO-PRO-1 positives).

Méthodes. Des hommes évalués pour infertilité ont été phénotypés (AGD, volume testiculaire). Les échantillons spermatiques ont été enrichis (swim-up) puis triés par cytométrie selon la condensation chromatini­enne (CMA3) et la perméabilité membranaire apoptotique (YO-PRO-1). Le RRBS a profilé la méthylation CpG, avec une analyse ciblée des éléments Alu contenant des motifs ERE.

Résultats. Dans les spermatozoïdes non triés, les profils globaux de méthylation étaient comparables entre hommes infertiles (AGD courte) et donneurs fertiles. En revanche, dans les fractions triées, les hommes infertiles présentaient un enrichissement en Alu-ERE hypométhylés et un déficit en Alu-ERE hyperméthylés dans les sous-populations CMA3 positives et YO-PRO-1 positives.

Conclusions. Une perturbation prénatale estrogénique/anti-androgénique, reflétée à l’âge adulte par une AGD courte, pourrait laisser une empreinte durable dans la méthylation d’éléments répétitifs sensibles aux estrogènes dans le sperme. Ces anomalies, concentrées dans les spermatozoïdes à maturation chromatini­enne défectueuse ou en apoptose débutante, pourraient contribuer à une baisse de compétence fécondante et à un risque épigénétique intergénérationnel. Des pistes de validation sont proposées.

Introduction

The testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) hypothesis posits that a spectrum of male reproductive disorders—cryptorchidism, hypospadias, low sperm counts/poor semen quality and testicular germ cell cancer—share origins in disturbed fetal testis development driven by gene–environment interactions [1,2]. A practical anthropometric proxy of that early hormonal milieu is anogenital distance (AGD), which is longer in males, established in utero, and trackable across life [3–6]. In humans, shorter male AGD has been associated with cryptorchidism and hypospadias in infancy, and with lower semen quality and reduced testicular volume in adulthood [3–6]. (For contemporary overviews linking AGD with male reproductive outcomes see [3–6].)

Many endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) with widespread human exposure (e.g., phthalates, bisphenol A) can act via estrogen receptor pathways or antiandrogenic mechanisms during the fetal masculinization window, and several birth cohort studies associate prenatal phthalate exposure with shorter male AGD [7–12].

A critical mechanistic puzzle is: How do transient fetal exposures produce enduring molecular changes that persist into adult spermatogenesis? One compelling answer is epigenetic reprogramming in the postimplantation embryo. During weeks 7–17 of human development, PGCs undergo profound, genome-wide DNA demethylation followed by sex-specific re-methylation; transposable elements show distinctive and dynamic methylation behavior during this time [13–15].

Notably, transposable elements (TEs)—especially primate-specific Alu repeats—are not inert “junk,” but major contributors to the mammalian regulatory landscape; numerous transcription factor binding sites, including those for estrogen receptor α (ESR1), derive from TEs [16–18] If prenatal estrogenic signaling targets TE-borne ER response elements (EREs) during the PGC reprogramming window, persistent, locus-selective methylation scars could plausibly be carried forward into adult sperm.

Here we integrate a Basel clinical study framework with the broader literature to examine whether infertile men with shortened AGD harbor altered DNA methylation at ER-responsive repetitive elements in sperm, and how such alterations relate to chromatin maturity and apoptosis at the single-cell fraction level [19].

Background and Rationale

AGD as a biomarker of fetal androgen/estrogen balance

AGD is established by the androgen surge in the masculinization programming window and remains sexually dimorphic throughout life. Epidemiologic studies in men link shorter AGD to poorer semen quality and lower testicular volume, while pediatric studies associate shorter AGD with cryptorchidism and hypospadias [3–6].

Endocrine disruptors that impinge on ER signaling and AGD

Prenatal phthalate exposure has been associated with shorter AGD in boys (notably in U.S. cohorts), and BPA/other EDCs can signal through ERα/ERβ with genomic actions at EREs and non-genomic membrane-initiated cascades [7–12, 20–22]. This fits TDS, where fetal testis endocrine dysfunction seeds later dysfunctions [1,2].

Why repetitive DNA?

Repetitive elements (e.g., Alu, LINE-1) are abundant in the human genome. TEs seed transcription-factor binding motifs and shape regulatory innovation [16–18]. Crucially, many ER binding sites in human cells map to TE-derived sequences; ERE-like motifs are over-represented in Alu families, providing a substrate for estrogen-dependent regulation and potential targets for EDCs [16–18].

The PGC reprogramming window

Human PGCs undergo near-global DNA methylation erasure followed by sex-specific re-methylation during fetal development, with TEs displaying family-specific dynamics [13–15]. If estrogenic/antiandrogenic signals alter the establishment of methylation at Alu-ERE loci, such changes could persist into the adult germline, making mature sperm a biospecimen to read out those early events.

Clinical Study Overview (Basel): Phenotyping, Sorting and Methylome Profiling

Participants and clinical phenotyping

Infertile men were recruited from a university fertility clinic; AGD (anus-to-scrotum) and testicular volume were measured. Fertile sperm donors served as controls. Because downstream assays required sufficient cell numbers, men with normozoospermia or mild oligozoospermia were preferentially included. Shortened AGD defined the infertile patient group, consistent with TDS epidemiology [3–6].

Sperm sub-fractionation by functional staining

To reduce heterogeneity, ejaculates were sorted by flow cytometry into subpopulations using:

  • Chromomycin A3 (CMA3)—a fluorochrome that competes with protamines for DNA binding. High CMA3 staining indicates protamine deficiency / histone retention and is linked to poor chromatin condensation [23].
  • YO-PRO-1—an early-apoptosis marker permeating cells with compromised membranes; in human sperm it correlates with DNA fragmentation and apoptotic features [24].

DNA methylation assay

Genome-wide CpG methylation was profiled by reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS)—an established, cost-effective method enriching for CpG-dense regions while preserving quantitative methylation calls at single-CpG resolution [25–27]. Bioinformatics focused on Alu repeats carrying canonical/pseudo-ERE motifs and, when available, ER ChIP-seq-supported sites (to enrich for bona fide estrogen-responsive repeats). The primary contrasts were between infertile men (short AGD) versus fertile donors, both globally and within sorted subfractions (CMA3^high/low and YO-PRO-1^pos/neg).

Key Findings (Integrated Summary)

  1. Global methylation: When all sperm were analyzed without regard to subfraction, global CpG methylation distributions were broadly similar between infertile and fertile men—unsurprising given the dilution of subtle, cell-state–specific signals by population averaging.
  2. ERE-bearing Alu elements: Within CMA3-positive (chromatin-immature) fractions from infertile men with short AGD, hypomethylated Alu-EREs were significantly enriched, whereas hypermethylated Alu-EREs were under-represented relative to fertile controls. Analogous patterns were seen in YO-PRO-1–positive (apoptosis-prone) fractions.
  3. Functional link: The co-localization of altered methylation at ER-responsive repetitive loci with chromatin immaturity and apoptotic signatures suggests that epigenetic scars of ER signaling (potentially laid down in fetal life) are preferentially carried by sperm subpopulations with reduced fertilizing potential.

These observations provide a mechanistic bridge among short AGD, EDC/ER signaling, and sperm functional deficits, consistent with TDS. (For background linking AGD to adult semen/testis phenotypes see [3–6]; for TE-derived ER regulatory sites see [16–18]; for CMA3/apoptosis markers see [23,24].

Mechanistic Interpretation

A prenatal “hit” recorded in repetitive DNA

During PGC reprogramming, TEs undergo dynamic methylation. If the embryo/fetus experiences estrogenic/antiandrogenic perturbation (e.g., phthalates, BPA), ER signaling may transiently bind ERE-like motifs within Alu repeats, locally affecting de novo methyltransferase access/activity. The result would be stable hypomethylation/hypermethylation at specific Alu-ERE loci that persist into spermatogenesis. In adulthood—especially under suboptimal testicular environments consonant with the TDS spectrum—those loci may co-segregate with spermatozoa showing chromatin remodeling defects (CMA3^high) or apoptotic features (YO-PRO-1^pos), amplifying functional consequences.

Why the signal concentrates in CMA3+ and YO-PRO-1+ subfractions

Spermiogenesis involves histone–protamine exchange; failures in this process yield protamine deficiency and retained histones, captured by CMA3 staining and linked to impaired DNA packaging and fertility [23]. Apoptotic signaling in sperm (YO-PRO-1 positivity) correlates with DNA fragmentation and reduced fertilizing capacity [24]. If Alu-ERE methylation lesions predispose to faulty chromatin remodeling or heightened DNA damage response during spermiogenesis, they would enrich within these “abnormal” subpopulations.

TDS context

Short AGD has been associated with cryptorchidism/hypospadias and impaired semen quality/testicular size, consistent with TDS [1–6]. The Alu-ERE methylation signature offers a molecular substrate for that syndrome—an imprintable, ER-tunable repetitive element network perturbed during the fetal masculinization window and expressed later as sperm functional deficits.

Methodological Considerations

Phenotyping

Standardized AGD measurement protocols, blind to case/control status, minimize misclassification. Notably, AGD is only weakly related to adult BMI and can be reliably measured across adulthood [4–6]. Testicular volume by ultrasound/orchidometer provides a concurrent functional correlate.

Cell sorting and markers

CMA3 and YO-PRO-1 are widely used markers in andrology laboratories: CMA3 positively correlates with protamine deficiency and adverse semen parameters [23]; YO-PRO-1 is validated as a sperm apoptosis/early membrane compromise marker with associations to DNA fragmentation [24].

RRBS and repetitive methylomes

RRBS captures CpG-rich portions of the genome and, when paired with repeat-aware mapping, can robustly quantify methylation within Alu subfamilies [25–27]. Orthogonal methods (e.g., targeted bisulfite amplicon sequencing at sentinel Alu-EREs; Nanopore methyl-calling spanning repeats) can validate index findings.

Bioinformatics focus on ERE-bearing Alu

Alu consensus contains ERE-like motifs; multiple ER cistromes show strong enrichment in TEs [16–18]. Filtering Alu instances by ERE motif quality and ER ChIP support increases specificity for estrogen-responsive elements while controlling for the high copy number of Alu.

Clinical and Translational Implications

  1. Etiologic insight: A short AGD in an infertile man is not just an anatomic curiosity; it plausibly indexes fetal endocrine disruption and, as shown here, may co-occur with molecular scars in sperm at ER-responsive repeats. This accords with epidemiologic links between AGD and semen quality/testicular volume [3–6].
  2. Biomarker development: A composite biomarker combining AGD, sperm subfraction proportions (CMA3^high, YO-PRO-1^pos), and Alu-ERE methylation indices could stratify idiopathic male infertility and ART prognosis.
  3. Exposure reconstruction and prevention: Although direct prenatal exposure data are rarely available decades later, molecular readouts (e.g., ERE-Alu methylation) might help reconstruct exposure histories at a class level (estrogenic vs. antiandrogenic). This could motivate public-health measures aimed at reducing EDC exposure during pregnancy [7–12,20–22].
  4. Intergenerational considerations: TE-proximal methylation changes in sperm raise questions about embryo/placental gene regulation at implantation and offspring health—areas suited to prospective preconception cohorts and embryo-derived tissue studies.

Limitations

  • Sample size and age: Clinical constraints limit recruitment; infertile adults are often older than fertile donors, a potential confounder—though methylation contrasts were subfraction-specific rather than global.
  • Exposure misclassification: Short AGD is a proxy, not proof, of prenatal EDC exposure; contemporaneous fetal biospecimens are unavailable.
  • Marker specificity: CMA3 is a proxy for protamine deficiency; YO-PRO-1 marks early apoptosis—neither is a functional assay of fertilization competence.
  • Technology: RRBS under-samples LINE-1 and intergenic CpG-poor regions; repeat-aware alignments are essential. Orthogonal long-read methylomics and single-cell multi-omics would refine locus-specific inferences.
  • Causality: Cross-sectional design cannot establish causal direction; longitudinal conception cohorts will be decisive.

Future Directions

  1. Replication and expansion: Multi-center replication with larger, age-balanced cohorts; inclusion of cryptorchidism/hypospadias histories to position findings within the TDS spectrum.

    2.   Orthogonal validation: Amplicon bisulfite and Nanopore methyl-calling at sentinel Alu-EREs across sperm fractions and in testicular germ-cell subtypes.

    3.   Functional tests: CRISPR-dCas9-DNMT/TET editing to modulate Alu-ERE methylation in spermatid-like cells and read out effects on chromatin compaction, DNA damage, and apoptosis.

    4.   Exposure biology: In vitro human gonadal organoids/PGC-like cells exposed to ER agonists/antagonists (and phthalates/BPA) to model locus-specific methylation changes at repeats.

    5.   Clinical translation: Develop a composite risk score (AGD + sperm subfraction proportions + repeat methylation signature) for idiopathic infertility counseling and ART pathway selection.

Conclusions

Men who present with shortened AGD and infertility frequently reside within the TDS continuum, reflecting disrupted fetal testis programming. A mechanistically coherent, testable model—supported by clinical methylome profiling—is that estrogen-responsive Alu elements in sperm carry persistent methylation alterations in such men, particularly within chromatin-immature and apoptosis-prone sperm subpopulations. This model integrates fetal endocrine disruption, PGC epigenetic reprogramming, and adult sperm function, offering a route to molecular biomarkers and preventive strategies. Translational next steps include multicenter validation, orthogonal epigenomics, and functional perturbation of Alu-ERE methylation to establish causality and clinical utility.

Declaration Section

a) Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate Investigations were carried out in accordance 326 with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, revised in 2008.

b) Consent for publication Not applicable

c) Availability of data and supporting material  Not applicable

d) Competing interests  Author/s declare that they have no competing interests

e) Funding none

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Swiss Center for Applied Human Toxicology (SCAHT) framework; clinical phenotyping and sorting teams; genomic and bioinformatics collaborators; and the participating patients and donors.

References

  1. Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(5):972-8.
  2. Toppari J, Virtanen HE, Main KM, Skakkebaek NE. Cryptorchidism and hypospadias as a sign of testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS): environmental connection. Int J Androl. 2006;29(1):193-7.
  3. Thankamony A, Pasterski V, Ong KK, Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Anogenital distance from birth to 2 years: a population study of 2,168 infants. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2967-74.
  4. Eisenberg ML, Hsieh MH, Walters RC, Krasnow R, Lipshultz LI et al. The relationship between anogenital distance, fatherhood, and fertility in adult men. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(11):2799-804.
  5. Mira-Escolano MP, Mendiola J, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Roca M, Cutillas-Tolín A, López-Espín JJ . Anogenital distance of women in relation to their mother’s gynaecological characteristics before or during pregnancy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Feb;28(2):209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.026.
  6. Radke EG, Glenn BS, Braun JM, Cooper GS. Phthalate exposure and male reproductive outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2018;121(Pt 1):764-93.
  7. Swan SH, Main KM, Liu F, Stewart SL, Kruse RL, Calafat AM et al. Study for Future Families Research Team. Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):1056-61. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8100.
  8. Swan SH. Environmental phthalate exposure in relation to reproductive outcomes and other health endpoints in humans. Environ Res. 2008;108(2):177-84.
  9. Jensen TK, Frederiksen H, Kyhl HB, Lassen TH, Swan SH, Bornehag CG et al. Prenatal Exposure to Phthalates and Anogenital Distance in Male Infants from a Low-Exposed Danish Cohort (2010-2012). Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Jul;124(7):1107-13. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1509870.
  10. Vandenberg LN, Maffini MV, Sonnenschein C, Rubin BS, Soto AM. Bisphenol-A and the great divide: A review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption. Endocr Rev. 2009;30(1):75-95.
  11. Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS et al. EDC-2: The Endocrine Society’s Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015 Dec;36(6):E1-E150. doi: 10.1210/er.2015-1010.
  12. Kortenkamp A, Martin O, Evans R, Orton F, McKinlay R, Rosivatz E et al. Response to A critique of the European Commission Document, “State of the Art Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters” by Rhomberg and colleagues–letter to the editor. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2012 Oct;42(9):787-9; author reply 790-1. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2012.712943.
  13. Tang WW, Dietmann S, Irie N, Leitch HG, Floros VI, Bradshaw CR et al. A Unique Gene Regulatory Network Resets the Human Germline Epigenome for Development. Cell. 2015 Jun 4;161(6):1453-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.053.
  14. Guibert S, Forné T, Weber M. Global profiling of DNA methylation erasure in mouse primordial germ cells. Genome Res. 2012 Apr;22(4):633-41. doi: 10.1101/gr.130997.111.
  15. Seisenberger S, Peat JR, Hore TA, Santos F, Dean W, Reik W. Reprogramming DNA methylation in the mammalian life cycle: building and breaking epigenetic barriers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 5;368(1609):20110330. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0330.
  16. Bourque G, Leong B, Vega VB, Chen X, Lee YL, Srinivasan KG et al. Evolution of the mammalian transcription factor binding repertoire via transposable elements. Genome Res. 2008 Nov;18(11):1752-62. doi: 10.1101/gr.080663.108.
  17. Chuong EB, Elde NC, Feschotte C. Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18(2):71-86.
  18. Klinge CM. Estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen response elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(14):2905-19.
  19. Stenz L, Beyens M, Gill ME, Paoloni-Giacobino A, De Geyter C. Altered DNA methylation in estrogen-responsive repetitive sequences of spermatozoa of infertile men with shortened anogenital distance. Clin Epigenetics. 2022;14(1):185. 
  20. Vega VB, Lin CY, Lai KS, Kong SL, Xie M, Su X et al. Multiplatform genome-wide identification and modeling of functional human estrogen receptor binding sites. Genome Biol. 2006;7(9):R82. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-9-r82.
  21. Heger Z. Bisphenols and the estrogen receptor: molecular mechanisms and health risks. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(24):15467.
  22. Howdeshell KL, Rider CV, Wilson VS, Gray LE Jr. Mechanisms of action of phthalate esters. Toxicol Lett. 2008;180(2):137-43.
  23. Anifandis G, Messini CI, Dafopoulos K. Sperm chromatin decondensation and its association with conventional semen parameters in infertile men. Andrology. 2016;4(6):1135-41.
  24. Ribeiro SC, Sartorius G, Pletscher F, De Geyter M, Zhang H, De Geyter C. Isolation of spermatozoa with low levels of fragmented DNA with the use of flow cytometry and sorting. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):686-94.
  25. Meissner A, Gnirke A, Bell GW, Ramsahoye B, Lander ES, Jaenisch R. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Oct 13;33(18):5868-77. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki901
  26. Gu H, Smith ZD, Bock C, Boyle P, Gnirke A, Meissner A. Preparation of reduced representation bisulfite sequencing libraries for genome-scale DNA methylation profiling. Nat Protoc. 2011 Apr;6(4):468-81. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.190.
  27. Boyle P, Clement K, Gu H, Smith ZD, Ziller M, Fostel JL et al. Gel-free multiplexed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for large-scale DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 2012 Oct 3;13(10):R92. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r92.

Christian De Geyter

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Id mollis nulla maecenas at vestibulum blandit consectetur. Vulputate libero turpis diam eu rhoncus arcu. Donec at imperdiet viverra ut eu sagittis nunc volutpat. Sem nisi turpis venenatis non sed adipiscing donec dignissim.